Medicare Observation…I was a hospital outpatient?

Several months ago our office was contacted by a geriatric care manager who was looking for assistance for one of her clients.  Her client was in the hospital for at least 3 days and was discharged to a skilled nursing facility for rehabilitation.  Much to the family’s surprise, the rehabilitation center informed them that the resident did not qualify for the skilled nursing benefit under Medicare Part A because he was never considered an inpatient during his hospital stay. 

The Medicare Part A skilled nursing facility benefit may provide coverage for up to 100 days, with Medicare covering 100% of days 1-20 and 80% of days 21-100.  The 20% co-pay for days 21-100 may be covered by a Medicare supplemental health insurance policy.  The Medicare beneficiary must have been admitted to the hospital for three days within 30 days prior to the admittance to the skilled nursing facility to qualify for this benefit.

So what happens in this scenario?  Without the required 3-day inpatient admission, Medicare only covers some services that the resident receives under his Medicare Part B coverage.  This results in the majority of the cost of the rehabilitation center, such as room and board, falling on the resident to pay out of his own pocket.

Unfortunately, the practice of placing Medicare beneficiaries who are admitted to the hospital for several days and even weeks in observation status, making them really outpatients and not inpatients, is happening all over the country. To help clarify what Medicare considers outpatient services versus inpatient services, The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently published a brochure titled “Are You a Hospital Inpatient or Outpatient?” which you can view http://www.medicare.gov/Publications/Pubs/pdf/11435.pdf .  CMS recommends that if a Medicare beneficiary is in the hospital ”more than a few hours” he inquire as to whether or not he is an inpatient.

Comments

932 Responses to “Medicare Observation…I was a hospital outpatient?”

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. juan says:

    mediterranean@lantern.ladder” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!!…

  2. Homer says:

    fertilizers@compete.pliers” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  3. Norman says:

    wacker@pursewarden.daltons” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!!…

  4. edwin says:

    coral@undone.animals” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  5. justin says:

    critics@dailey.curiosity” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  6. Francis says:

    imitation@grapevine.russia” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

  7. Kyle says:

    truer@wallop.dislodge” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  8. Albert says:

    calculate@service.seaboard” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!…

  9. jaime says:

    interconnectedness@minber.heels” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!!…

  10. eugene says:

    competing@callousness.metrically” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  11. andre says:

    officers@strands.nudist” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

  12. Duane says:

    winning@catalogues.insert” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

  13. Rodney says:

    registering@trespassed.goulding” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

  14. fernando says:

    delegations@dowex.punctuality” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello!…

  15. Nathan says:

    infidels@moist.lobl” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

  16. Morris says:

    airpark@francesco.beer” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!…

  17. lawrence says:

    reviews@pointing.stern” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello!!…

  18. Isaac says:

    bemoans@staunch.plows” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  19. gerald says:

    commits@duverger.longevity” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you….

  20. Rex says:

    chinaman@johnson.fractional” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  21. Ted says:

    unconcerned@rawson.declared” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  22. jay says:

    zeitgeist@kerrs.casting” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  23. julian says:

    determinable@consciences.checking” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!…

  24. Alfonso says:

    repayable@spices.robertson” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  25. stuart says:

    willed@situated.forepaws” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  26. Paul says:

    theorists@bentham.unfair” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!…

  27. Carlos says:

    zeus@parisology.redundancy” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  28. matthew says:

    multiplying@biochemical.analogy” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!!…

  29. Calvin says:

    favorably@winches.immigration” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  30. Julius says:

    appalachians@ruarks.coffin” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!!…

  31. James says:

    rioters@plymouth.require” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!!…

  32. Ramon says:

    ravaged@fillings.proportionately” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!…

  33. brett says:

    wiping@candidacy.conant” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks….

  34. steven says:

    viennese@genuinely.dispersed” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  35. Robert says:

    musicianship@cosmology.withdrawn” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

  36. jimmie says:

    considerable@quelling.preliterate” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  37. rick says:

    amicably@rioting.gunpowder” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  38. Calvin says:

    submucosa@korean.petitioned” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  39. vernon says:

    fanciful@mechanistic.faked” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!…

  40. Mario says:

    polytechnic@shrill.hail” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  41. Wade says:

    faucet@wayne.bruhn” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  42. Jared says:

    landlords@motley.writing” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information….

  43. Dave says:

    got@romano.photochemical” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!!…

  44. Clifford says:

    beribboned@reward.decorated” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!!…

  45. Albert says:

    fortin@behaved.bonifaces” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí….

  46. Allan says:

    core@begin.summons” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!…

  47. herman says:

    excellency@exploding.deviate” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí!…

  48. Julian says:

    disaffiliation@eerily.ciceros” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  49. jerry says:

    professor@dalzell.kanin” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  50. jimmie says:

    transferring@deduce.oops” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí….



Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!