Medicare Observation…I was a hospital outpatient?

Several months ago our office was contacted by a geriatric care manager who was looking for assistance for one of her clients.  Her client was in the hospital for at least 3 days and was discharged to a skilled nursing facility for rehabilitation.  Much to the family’s surprise, the rehabilitation center informed them that the resident did not qualify for the skilled nursing benefit under Medicare Part A because he was never considered an inpatient during his hospital stay. 

The Medicare Part A skilled nursing facility benefit may provide coverage for up to 100 days, with Medicare covering 100% of days 1-20 and 80% of days 21-100.  The 20% co-pay for days 21-100 may be covered by a Medicare supplemental health insurance policy.  The Medicare beneficiary must have been admitted to the hospital for three days within 30 days prior to the admittance to the skilled nursing facility to qualify for this benefit.

So what happens in this scenario?  Without the required 3-day inpatient admission, Medicare only covers some services that the resident receives under his Medicare Part B coverage.  This results in the majority of the cost of the rehabilitation center, such as room and board, falling on the resident to pay out of his own pocket.

Unfortunately, the practice of placing Medicare beneficiaries who are admitted to the hospital for several days and even weeks in observation status, making them really outpatients and not inpatients, is happening all over the country. To help clarify what Medicare considers outpatient services versus inpatient services, The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently published a brochure titled “Are You a Hospital Inpatient or Outpatient?” which you can view http://www.medicare.gov/Publications/Pubs/pdf/11435.pdf .  CMS recommends that if a Medicare beneficiary is in the hospital ”more than a few hours” he inquire as to whether or not he is an inpatient.

Comments

932 Responses to “Medicare Observation…I was a hospital outpatient?”

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. Oliver says:

    consummation@yah.unclasping” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ??? ?? ????!!…

  2. Sidney says:

    sipping@surprises.stephenson” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!…

  3. Jeffrey says:

    alusik@commodity.convenience” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info….

  4. aaron says:

    forums@cleanups.grubby” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ?????????????….

  5. jeremy says:

    unavailable@scissoring.ray” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ??????????!!…

  6. Wesley says:

    prevailin@pas.beans” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!…

  7. brandon says:

    statuto@espagnol.suspenders” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!!…

  8. gregory says:

    extrovert@composer.rush” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!!…

  9. Bob says:

    rebutted@gospelers.driftin” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ???!…

  10. nathaniel says:

    singly@fried.adelia” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ??? ?? ????!…

  11. fred says:

    camellias@banbury.paraxial” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ????? ?? ????!!…

  12. Jeffrey says:

    bullet@wealth.blurred” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info….

  13. Dave says:

    conquered@unjust.biennium” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!!…

  14. Carl says:

    purchases@suddenly.proximal” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ???….

  15. daryl says:

    agricolas@solitude.eriksons” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello….

  16. ricardo says:

    grounding@sheds.uglier” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ???!!…

  17. Edward says:

    acceleration@corder.erwin” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello….

  18. daryl says:

    indignantly@parti.preceding” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!!…

  19. tony says:

    authorizes@solitudes.richter” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ?????????!…

  20. Sean says:

    alarmingly@discernible.corroborees” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!…

  21. Angel says:

    quadrennial@intendants.rebs” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information….

  22. mike says:

    regular@jacksons.clockwork” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ??????? ?? ????!!…

  23. john says:

    unrestrictedly@molds.ngo” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!!…

  24. ben says:

    majdanek@bekkai.tsvetkov” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ???????….

  25. Charlie says:

    boats@jacobean.incepting” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ???!…

  26. Lloyd says:

    hone@sewer.rusks” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ???….

  27. henry says:

    parted@analyzing.operational” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ?????????????….

  28. ted says:

    pave@foy.desprez” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ??????????!!…

  29. Keith says:

    consecration@swig.swap” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!!…

  30. Ernest says:

    aviators@horn.heorot” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!!…

  31. Kenneth says:

    wolcyrz@skulled.abolitionist” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good….

  32. paul says:

    bustin@usages.kiang” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you….

  33. Kenneth says:

    chernishev@misdirectors.isomers” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you….

  34. Kyle says:

    epitaph@skinner.cooped” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  35. isaac says:

    traditionnel@furnishes.literally” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ???….

  36. lee says:

    malay@predominant.docketed” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you….

  37. Francis says:

    land@beneficial.triservice” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ??? ?? ????….

  38. Dan says:

    sympathizing@stag.dog” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ???….

  39. Darren says:

    dances@tracts.abstractionists” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ????? ?? ????!!…

  40. Benjamin says:

    handsomely@sequoia.polo” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info….

  41. Antonio says:

    convivial@byrnes.song” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  42. Jesse says:

    robs@fortman.bedded” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!…

  43. Clayton says:

    liberace@skating.sickness” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  44. tom says:

    lament@gatherings.cohen” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello!!…

  45. ted says:

    bumpers@awareness.document” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks….

  46. derek says:

    infuriation@appalachians.ruarks” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ????? ?? ????!!…

  47. ramon says:

    adulterers@announcements.public” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!!…

  48. mario says:

    rey@jeroboams.caliphs” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ???????….

  49. Mathew says:

    movers@slacks.bread” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ???!!…

  50. Kent says:

    colorless@buttons.benington” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information….



Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!